#untagged because I'm not coming back to Tumblr

[fukasenanairo]

How to do this....

Thank you for taking time to reply. I apologize for not being able to keep this short - it seems I have more to say than I realized. I'll take a best efforts to organize this into sections and pray the rambling does not get too out of left field.

However, it seems that I'll end up doing something unexpected again. I do apologize beforehand.

-------

TO ANSWER, yes, I've read most of the arguments on PDB. Only for Neuvillette now that I think of it, and maybe Cyno. Unsurprisingly, I'm not interested in any other type. So I have read the ones you have up there, and I've read Jung and Pierce and everything else, but I must confess sometimes my eyes glaze over at the theories. Regrettably, I also often find my eyes glossing over the specific Character Story you mentioned, since that's one of the ones with (in my view) more allegories and metaphors. So I understand your arguments in principle, but I will unfortunately not be able to add much to them.

(It's not that metaphors are difficult. Metaphors simply require an additional layer of deciphering that most often turns out to be incorrect - or at the very least, not a faithful representation of the intent, because each person perceives meaning in a different way. In short, they are difficult. I have a problem with words.)

However, there must be something I can do. So this is my efforts to take note of things that 'make sense', and try to explain WHY they make sense in a personal capacity. I'll try to avoid arguments that were already brought up on PDB.

Let's go back to the Character Story you brought up:

"In that case, why don't you just watch over the Fontainians? They were born from the Primordial Sea, after all. That makes them part of this planet's native life, too, and a form of life that requires your care."

The previous paragraphs clearly define "the human realm" and "fate" as systems belonging to the present rulers of the world, and the (natural) conclusion is that Neuvillette has no need to concern himself over them. This quote does not overturn this principle (which would be ridiculously difficult), but uses his own definitions to argue that unlike "the human realm" which is perceived as alien for reasons et al, "Fontainians", as 'the planet's native life', are under his purview. Hence, it makes sense. This is partly what was meant in my ask.

(I would desperately want to see who said this, btw. The kind of person who can get the Hydro Dragon to care for Fontainians on a logical technicality is nothing short of a genius. And clearly he is convinced! For all he says about 'pleasing rhetoric'.)

(In case that was not obvious, I was the person who sent the ask. Forgive the rudeness - I have not returned to Tumblr in upwards of seven years.)

-------

ON THE DIFFERENCE OF TI V. TE. I've worked with several (assumed) Te doms in my life, and a consistent pattern I have noticed is that, the conclusion being equal, the path each of us uses to rationalize it is completely different.

Clearly I'd need an illustration to my hypothesis - simple abstract theory drives me nuts. Let us take for granted that Ti is present in Neuvillette's judgement in Callas' trial (incidentally, I agree). Thus here is a thought experiment: What if, for example, it had been a Te-dom (say, Wriothesley) presiding over Callas' trial?

In this thought experiment, we have the following pieces of information:

A: All evidence points to Callas being guilty. Callas himself does not contradict this accusation.

B: The judge feels a hunch that something is amiss.

For convenience's sake, let us assume that the end result does not change; B is discarded, A is taken as the truth, and the judge does not stop Callas' duel. I'm modelling the Te course of action based on the incident where Wriothesley has 'a hunch' that Lyney and co. are up to no good in the Fortress of Meropide, thus in this hypothetical situation I would imagine:

Te: Gathers information to ascertain the validity of B. (The method of information gathering, Si or Ni, does not matter). "All I care about is the answer." In this case, no usable information comes up, and B is discarded.

Ti: (May also gather information). In addition, B, which implies that Callas is innocent and thus willingly walking to his death (a point against Ne, since he does not bother entertaining possibilities like Callas being suicidal or having a terminal disease - which in this case is the truth), is tested against the principle, "Nothing is more important than one's continued survival". B does not follow the principle, and is thus discarded.

While the end result does not change, the paths used to get there are different (almost an extra step for Ti). Incidentally, we see the pitfalls of each type: Te relies on an incomplete presentation of the facts, and Ti dismisses the truth based on a false premise.

On a side note, this is why Ti is more troublesome than it's worth - it has a stunning lack of respect for fact-checking. From a Ti-Se perspective, all information is taken in as is, therefore all information is (if not already taken as fact, ignored of their "factualness") "data points". Data points are used to draw, test, and extrapolate against, a line-of-best-fit (the principle).

To make it worse, extrapolation against this line-of-best-fit are usually wrong. Take Neuvillette's story quest, Carole's case. A very simple description of the facts are:

A Melusine, Carole, is harmed.

Carole takes her own life. Neuvillette learns of a conspiracy.

Neuvillette internalizes the principle that 'Factions against him will harm Melusines to get to him'. The implication is that 'If a Melusine is harmed (A), then it is possibly a conspiracy to get to him (B)'.

Now, at the beginning, we have the following:

A Melusine, Kiara, is threatened (this is not even A - simply a precursor to A!)

Armed with the principle, Neuvillette immediately assumes there is a conspiracy targeted at him and acts as if this is the likeliest possibility. (Precursor) A equals B, with stunningly little room to consider other possibilities, actual contexts, or even to withhold theories and judgments. Obviously in the end Wriothesley calls him an overthinking idiot in not so many words. (Poetic justice, that a Te-dom is the first to do so! Certainly brings to mind the many painful occasions being told 'Have you considered this instead?? Have you checked your sources??' by the various Te-doms in my life).

In his (or dare I say mine?) defense, what constitutes a "fact"? Consider the below exchange:

Neuvillette: "Distinct differences exist between the waters of each area. You'll appreciate their intricacies once you taste them carefully." Paimon: "Really? Let Paimon try..." Neuvillette: "What do you think?" Paimon: "Nope, Paimon couldn't taste any difference at all! Isn't this just normal water?" Neuvillette: lol skill issue "How regrettable. It seems like you still have a long way to go in refining your tastes."

Paimon: the audacity of this lizard

Here the taste is taken as a natural fact. He is convinced that Paimon would understand once she tastes it - it is, after all, fact - and is genuinely flummoxed that she doesn't. Obviously none of us are Hydro Dragons or water nerds, but that's an us problem.

I posit that it is also why there is, in general, almost a devaluation of what I called "factualness" earlier - facts to one are not facts to others and vice versa. Hence there are no real facts; all facts are data points. With enough accommodation to the speaker's perspective, all data points are equal in the eyes of the beholder.

Neuvillette: "This bears a striking resemblance to the Fountain of Lucine. Sadly, the water here comes from a different source, so there is, of course, no way to replicate the taste. Nevertheless, prior experience tells me that to most people, the visual similarity alone would be enough to prompt them to say a phrase such as: "This area has a very Fountain of Lucine flavor." ...My cup is empty. May I avail myself of your fountain?"

To me it is all very obvious, and so I find reiterating the point to be not only redundant but also dangerous. I'm also at significant risk of trying to fit a square peg to a round hole. But here goes.

The fountain resembles the Fountain of Lucine (an objective, dispassionate observation, almost a point against Si)

However, the water comes from a different source (again, an objective observation) -> therefore the taste is not the same (implication).

Nevertheless, here he hypothesizes (in the weirdest way possible) that visual similarity may imply flavor similarity.

Test out the hypothesis, also with the weirdest excuse possible. (As if the Hydro Dragon cannot conjure water out of thin air!)

-------

IT IS, to me, infinitely amusing that a character that follows law and order is typed Te almost by default. While empirical, almost all the Te users I know skirt the law in the name of convenience, or some other rationale I cannot comprehend. It is the Ti users who evaluate the reasonableness of the laws and, should they pass muster, hold themselves to these laws with little to no exception (to our detriment). Why? Because once these laws pass muster, they are considered a principle. Principles, which imply that they are applicable to people at large and are for the greater good, must be followed. To do otherwise is to undermine the entire framework, to say much less of social good, and that just won't do.

Speaking of social good:

Neuvillette: "And by the way, I should probably let you know, even though I would prefer not to... There's someone sitting up there in the VIP seats that has been striking a pose for quite a while now... I believe she's trying to give you a most elegant and impressive first impression. So I think you should take notice of her (Ti) sooner rather than later, otherwise she may become flustered (Fe)."

I really do wonder what a Fi or Te user makes of this paragraph, whether they would question it. To me there is no question - another thing that makes sense.

'I'd rather not bring this up, but you should take notice of her'. Not because 'Disrespecting the Hydro Archon is a big deal' (hi, Wriothesley), not because 'it is rude not to pay attention to her' (and in the first place he'd rather not!), or anything else. It is because 'she will become flustered'. It is about her feelings, her responses would be a deviation from the current (social) atmosphere; and therefore it would not do.

Neuvillette: "Very good, that is for the best. No need to pay her any more attention, we may now enjoy the show."

The beautiful simplicity of Ti. It considers a problem Fe brought up (she may become flustered and that's bad), posits a solution (pay attention to her) then once solution is carried out -> problem is solved. Clean as a chemical reaction, if not for the fact that this exchange is completely absurd in reality.

(Incidentally, much as I've learned to conduct myself in social settings, this is basically what my social principles boil down to. Clean and simple; 'tell a funny story', 'focus on this and that part', 'remember to have a conclusion so they remember what you were saying', et cetera. Almost mechanical in nature. It even works.)

-------

CONCLUSION...There is none, perhaps, hence there is no need to reply if you'd even read this far. Maybe simply take this as an empirical account, or more likely an endless, unscientific ramble. I find myself trying to explain processes that feel as simple as 1+1=2 over and over, so I can't even say that the entire exercise has been helpful - other than being a puff piece I can look back and firm up on my vagueish ideas with from time to time.

I hope this was at least interesting to read and mull over a little. If you managed to get something out of this blurby, vague, inexplicable fever dream, all the better.

(Incidentally, my personality in real life is impulsive, slightly (rather?) lazy, a bit careless, but notably chirpy - not a social butterfly, but a social something. A cosmic comedy, no doubt, how THIS character out of all is the mirror to which I'm comparing my thought processes!)

(I hope you understand now why 500 characters were not enough)

Just wanted to pass by to tell you that I loved your analysis of Neuvillette's type on PDB! Full disclosure, my opinion is subject to intense bias since I'm an ISTP myself (~90% certainty) however I hope this is at least some validation for your part. It's amusing since his behaviors are significantly different from mine, and yet his words all 'make sense', for lack of a better word. Contrast to Wriothesley, who elicits a 'well he's right, buuuut...' feeling. Difficult to describe in 500 charas.

Hello kind stranger ! This was a very unexpected ask i'll say, even though I suppose my username IS exactly the same on PDB as it is here, making me quite easy to find in practice haha

I'm really happy my comment made sense to you ! Even now, I still firmly believe everything I wrote, and particularly that Neuvillette is a high Ti user. I don't know if you've read it, but I think there's another very good example of his Ti in his character story 5; when he describes his opinion on constellation and "fate"

One as great as he should have no need for a constellation to shine over him. After all, "fate" is merely the manner in which the present ruler of this world plays with living beings. Now that he has obtained one part of seven of the authority over the mortal realm, and reforged the throne and title of a "Fully Fledged Dragon," he is one strong enough to equal and rival "the human realm," and logic would dictate that he need not subscribe to this system known as "fate."

I think this is another good example that, at the end of the day, Neuvillette's thinking process is closer to Ti than it is to Te. There is a lot of "If Y, then logically following from this premise we can conclude X" when we're actually given the opportunity to delve into his mind. Pierce made the distinction between Ti & Te this way:

→ « Introverted Thinking — judgement based on what is subjectively denoted; i.e. a priori analysis; e.g. “If you accept my definition of 'murderer', then you must conclude with me that Colonel Mustard is one.” »

→ Extraverted Thinking — judgement based on what is objectively denoted; i.e. empirical science; e.g. “We all see the evidence (bloody hands, scene of the crime, etc.) therefore, we must all conclude that Colonel Mustard is Mr. Body's murderer.”

And I think that if we look at how Neuvillette thinks "for himself", beyond his role of judge where he is supposed to follow the laws, he really does fit the former more. Another example I developed somewhere else on his page that even Vautrain's trial shows this tendency imo ! Forgive me for this copy-past and ramble haha, this was in answer to someone asking how exactly Neuvillette could be "impartial" but have a subjective function as dominant, & my answer went like this:

This impartiality & "objectivity" while being subjective is further shown in his story quest. Despite Vautrain being one of the people he is closest to, he does not treat him differently from others in the court. but his judgment is still subjective, as evidenced by the ease with which he considers "different kinds of justice" during the trial. Te users, due to their "inherent" objectivity, often think that everyone with the same information should come to the same objective conclusion, while Ji users do not. Pierce described… Te : “We all see the evidence (bloody hands, scene of the crime, etc.) therefore, we must all conclude that Colonel Mustard is Mr. Body's murderer.” Ti : “If you accept my definition of 'murderer', then you must conclude with me that Colonel Mustard is one.” The way Neuvillette approaches that trial shows that for him, laws are simply a "definition", a logical premise from which a logical conclusion follow in the context of a trial.

Neuvillette: I acknowledge your arguments. Vautrin, your revenge could be seen as a form of justice. Neuvillette: I understand your decision. Which is why I cannot help but feel regret… and even grief about the judgment I must now impose. Neuvillette: However, personal justice does not equate to justice as defined by the law. To execute your plan for revenge, you abused your authority and conducted informal executions. Your actions have thus violated the law. Neuvillette: Therefore, you will be declared… guilty.

Neuvillette personally understands Vautrain's actions, and even "agrees" that depending on your definition of justice, his actions can be seen as just and right. However as the chief's justice, his job is to follow the established laws. And the way he describes that decision is how we can see the use of Ti despite his "following of the laws". Because the way it describes it pretty much echoes the colonel Mustard example. -> Personal justice does not equate justice as defined by the law. If we can agree that this court judges whether actions are just or not depending on whether they follow the law, then we can see that your actions have violated it. This makes Vautrain, according to the law, guilty. This is basically what Neuvillette says, in subtext. And he stays impartial by holding strong to these kind of decisions despite personal feelings on the matter. It's his job, so he follows the rules of his job. What he personally thinks and how he takes decision outside of it though is a whole other matter.

I feel like Genshin has become much less stereotypical & much more interesting in his character writing as of late so Neuvillette is very dear to my heart on that subject ! And he's, as you implied, a very good reminder that MBTI is first and foremost a system that deals with COGNITION and not behaviour. Thus it is how a character thinks, and not its actions, that should be examined to determine his MBTI type. Thank you again for taking the time to tell me here what you thought of my argument, it was unexpected but very much welcome <3 Hope these additions also make sense to you !

[velvetvexations]

Since we're talking about forcefem, here're most of the forcefem-related asks I've had in my inbox, some of which are a few days old on account of technically going in the vexatious tag if not exactly kink asks. I wanted to answer one from today on it's own which I'll get to later but I wanted to get to the older ones and also get to a few of the others from today while I was at it.

i just saw a post where a trans guy was showing some messages where someone was (unconsensually) basically roleplaying forcefemming him. despite him telling them that he did not want that and that it was very much transphobic, and he atill got a message boiling down to "you're not a man, silly, you're a girl :D" and. to be honest. this was the thing that stopped the brainworms of "what if the whole concept of transandrophobia is actually transmisogynistic and i am entirely wrong" bc at least some of these people will just say the most bog standard transphobic shit to trans guys and not register it as transphobia. so why the fuck would they be right about anything transmascs experience also on that note thank you for being so outspoken in favour of transmascs getting to discuss their oppression. it's really helpful to see trans women stand with us here, especially when it comes to aforementioned brainworms

congratulations to that transphobe for creating a new transandrobro

the 'forcemasc isnt revolutionary' shit is the most annoying iteration of stupid tumblr discourse. like im going through the tag trying to read some horny shit and oh look. theres someone being stupid and hypocritical. in my horny tag.

people are getting tribalist about kinks and it's depressing

Every time people are saying that trans men & mascs cannot possibly fathom being objectified & fetishized, I think on all of the posts I’ve seen that did that exact same thing. And yeah, some of it might have been kink, so no hate no judgement I dabble in that tag too, but I’ve also seen “get in the dress” type posts that seem to be genuinely calling for trans men to be more feminine, untagged & in the wild, enough where I’m like — am I just imagining this? Like am I crazy? Am I missing something, or was that extremely detailed post about why I MUST stay feminine — or become more — for someone else’s benefit being 100% serious? And, again — if it’s kink, all the power to them, I love that for them, I even occasionally love that for me. But I have encountered enough people who were dead serious that I sometimes want no one but trusted friends & advisors to ever witness me again. And then I look at statistics & feel genuinely ill. And yeah, I’m gnc — and there’s the rub, because while I feel genuine joy being fem as well as masc, I want it to be a Choice, not something forced upon me.

people need to be fucking normal

Yh like ik a lot of shitposts don't have any tags but people have. Really gotta tag forcefem. I've blocked a large amount of people making these jokes + filtered their names n I still see it

I'm sorry, anon. <3

Fuck thank you so much for talking so openly about forcemasc. I’m so dumb I thought there wasn’t a name for that kink that I’ve been into for years, albeit my version is way more weirder. It would be like a… forcemascfem??? Like first it’s forcemasc and then it turns into forcefem and then right back to forcemasc…. And then back to- Idk my gender is weird and my kinky fantasy for that is weird

Cross as many boundries as you want, that sounds rad. Forcefem has a lot of infrastructure to jump off of.

“I’m doing a kink in a non kink way so it’s not kink blog!” Sorry this pisses me off It’s still a kink. Like. If someone made an I-suggest-BDSM blog and tried to claim it wasn’t a kink blog I’m sure more people would see how silly this is but because it’s the transfem approved virtuous forcefem they just let it slide??? Like. You are engaging in a kink and thats fine. You can say there won’t be anything explicitly sexual! But it will still be a kink blog because it’s a blog about a kink! A kink blog if you will! It doesn’t matter if you’re not getting off to it, it’s still a kink! That you are participating in! On your blog about that kink!

It SHOULD piss you off! It's extremely fucking scummy!

what the hell? for like one solid minute(longer than that but i like saying it this way) all the forcefem on my dash was tagged and i could blissfully not have to see it every other post and then just today i had to unfollow a buncha people for an assload of untagged forcefem :/ like im transmasc i think its understandable that i do not wish to see that anyway hope your day is goin well miss velvet

yeah it's praxis to not tag kink anymore

trfs are perfectly aware what the "force" bit means when forcemasc comes up in conversation

strange how that works

[shh-no-more]

Okay I'm like 13 hours late but I managed to express my thoughts better so

So it's strange honestly I think like how we say Oh Britt should leave him or Britt should speak out about him. I think of how they have been married(?) for like 2 years now. This isnt gonna change for them just because of a few rumours on twitter. And I know that isn't what this is and it's not just rumours but I may be for them. The allegations have been out for years I bet Britt is too busy filming right now and doesn't go on social media. I feel like this is something only we experience here. Like most of the fandom has no idea. People on tiktok on insta or even here on tumblr. So for them to get divorced just for some fans discussing allegations is stretched. Thankfully action is being taken I guess? The untagging staff? But still we just suddenly brought these allegations to light after so long. I don't know how she could marry someone with allegations to his name already but maybe she didn't really know or they had died out or he lied to her. And since the victims are doing anything or taking action then nothing is happening right now for them. What I mean to say is if maybe britts pr or someone tells her. Oh britt you husband has many abuse allegations and people online are talking about it and they are leaving comments. she could be like Oh huh. What are you talking about you know the internet is a crazy place. Im just assuming but.? I mean if a month passes and he is still there i will obviously be disappointed and hate seeing him there but i will understand that us discussing this on a tumblr page doesnt really change anything for him or britt. at least some action has been taken with the untagging and all so theres hope. but i just feel like its the same for them

Maybe it's just me trying to feel okay about the possibility of him staying there but still it's something I think.. like what is he even doing now. Where are the victims ? What's happening

i don't think there's any way that she isn't aware that this is happening. it's not PR's job to completely shield their client, it's their job to arm them against the negative press that could be coming because of something or someone.

so i don't believe she doesn't know. i'm still 50/50 on how much she knew before all of this. someone here said something about how she seems very soft-hearted, quick to fall in love, naive, probably susceptible to tactics like love-bombing ... she had a shitty relationship with a guy she was engaged with who cheated on her, and she literally sold everything and bought a camper and joined the circus. and made a movie about it. like, that girl feels her feelings HARD and i completely and totally identify with that.

which is why people like us really are prone to getting in trouble with manipulators. we're so excited about love that we look past the red flags repeatedly. hell, i've gone so far as to actively NOT search someone on social media because i don't wanna know about their past lmao.

i also think it's entirely possible that she's just that good of an actor. i mean, we've all praised her to the moon and back for her performance in severance over and over and over. she might just be really good at playing the nice girl, and we all fell for it.

i just ... that doesn't feel right still. like i think i'm neurodivergent enough that i'm super sensitive to peoples' moods and little tells and stuff. she looked uncomfortable as HELL during the round table. i had chalked it up to being sat with fuckin billy bob and kaitlyn olsen and allison janney lmao but idk. i almost wanna clip that moment where they cheers to their spouses. i feel like she didn't look right.

BUT WHO FUCKING KNOWS. i'm so tired of feeling shitty about it. part of me is desperate to just go back to shitposting severance stuff and pretending this didnt happen. but then i think about how my inaction could lead to someone else getting assaulted, and i'm just not okay with that.

[castlebyersafterdark]

i know we are free love around here, 60s vibes, but do you ever feel a little shameful about liking noah or finn deep down? i still do :( not for queer reasons, just because they dont know who we are but we know lots about them comparatively. idk. sometimes i feel like im ogling lol. i mean, i am, but idk why that feels shameful.

Hmmmmm interesting one. To be honest - not really? I think I was hesitant to actually post or type out thoughts earlier on, but it wasn't like the thoughts weren't already in my brain, the thirst and the admiration and the imagination. I more felt bad about other people getting uncomfortable but just in that they needed a warning this was happening here and that's what my blog was about - and I think I give that vibe by now, it's pretty apparent what we're about in this little corner. If people hated it, they'd have told me and while I got hate in the past here, never about enjoying the boys. (Yet. Hoping to not jinx it.)

I understand the hesitation someone might feel though, and not everyone needs to be so blatant in regards to sex and scrutinizing lives and discussing the little personal details we find. But - I don't think there's anything wrong with it while staying in your lane. I keep it private, to the blog. It would take work to find a random untagged tumblr blog. I think we as fans of the famous have to reconcile the reality that celebrity comes with a layer of exploitation and too many personal details accessible to the public, their image copied everywhere, a little intrusive at times on a larger scale than the average person - but what are we gonna do about it? Human nature.

Does anyone really need to be famous? Nope. But people are talented or in the spotlight and so now we are aware and now we've latched on and formed a mental connection and we are interested and you can't take it back or shut it off! We are attracted or invested! Etc, etc. So - yes, we are ogling. But we're ogling strangers or people we know irl, too. We're looking up people's lives on social media and paying attention to details. We do that with anyone we know and form a mental connection towards. Like I said - for a celebrity this just happens on a larger scale with more people doing it. I think even if someone denies attraction, which is valid, liking a celebrity and following their life at all is a lot like having a crush and how a crush occupies the brain.

Maybe it plays into the current culture of guilt with any personal pleasure and that includes basic enjoyment of things that are overly indulgent? And celebrity culture and interest into it plays into it. This is definitely an indulgent interest or hobby. Or how people say that having a crush and thinking sexual thoughts about someone else is bad because it's non consensual WHICH - NO!! That's not how it works!! That is very dangerous thinking and what got the internet to where it is today. You can be attracted to and think about and even get off to other people and it's totally fine and natural and human. It's a culture of guilt and repression we are becoming suppressed and trapped under. It's totally OK to embrace interests and embrace sexuality and I'm not just talking about orientation.

There's a difference between saying all these things to a person's face and making them actually uncomfortable or going into someone's DMs and saying a bunch of out of nowhere sexual stuff or sending them explicit things about them. There's a difference between finding someone hot or talking with your friends about it or mentally getting off and treating the real person not like a real person with agency etc. Basically my rule is - is what you are currently doing about this affecting their lives?? If the answer is no, where is the harm? Stay in your lanes and appropriate spaces, let your brain wander where it wants and embrace it - because thought crimes are not real.

Fully down with and agree that my whole vibe is very free love and non-judgement and openness about sex and not just sex, but anything that brings safe harmless enjoyment and eases the mind about being true to yourself.

[hurtcomforted]

(this is not written in bad faith, i promise, i'm mostly just confused)

I've seen a lot of antishippers complain about coming across untagged non-con and it always baffled me a little, because. I've been reading all kinds of fics for almost a decade and never had that happen, and based on how many people say they've had that experinece, it sounds like I've had insane, impossible amount of luck. Not to mention that non-con sounds like a pretty big thing - it's a whole separate ao3 warning - that I cannot wrap my head around the idea of someone just forgetting to tag it, or straight up deciding not to.

I've been scrolling tumblr trying to find something that would make it make sense in my head. So far, I've come across a person complaining about authors using "chose not to use any warnings" instead of actually warning for non-con because they don't want to filter it out and lose all the fics that use it, a couple people talking about it not being tagged in twitter/tumblr posts (which brings me back to square one and might be somewhat of a different thing), and one person specifying that they hate when the author doesn't tag NC when characters don't ask for consent before kissing.

Is that what everyone means? Because I can admit that I can't remember the last time I read a fic where that happened, and not really even one where the characters had a consent talk before fucking, but in all of them, it was also pretty clear that the kiss wasn't unwanted either before or soon after it happened.

But. Is that what everyone is talking about? I am just so fucking confused but I really want to get it, someone please help.

[outoftheirdifferences]

respond to the following prompts out of character, then tag others you'd like to get to know a little bit better.

ROLEPLAYER NAME: Cheetah

ROLEPLAYER PRONOUNS: he/him

MUSE NAME(S): Angel; Vanellope Von Schweetz; Webby Vanderquack; Gosalyn Mallard; Angry; Connie Maheswaran; Cera; Annette, Collette and Danielle; Da Vinci Dalmatian; Terra; Lauren Salvage; Lilo Pelekai; Margo Gru.

PREFERRED COMMUNICATION: Tumblr IMs

EXPERIENCE: RPing since 2010, on tumblr since 2013

PREFERRED ROLEPLAY TYPE: Multi-para, only because I genuinely struggle to keep my posts any shorter than that!

PET PEEVES & DEALBREAKERS: Dealbreakers are typically things like an RP blog being substantially more unrelated ooc content than ic (I'll still interact with them as a partner but won't follow back); consistently getting single-line responses to multi-paragraph posts (I don't ever expect or ask for a partner to match my length, but I do need enough to work with!); untagged NS.FW posts; sometimes duplicates, depending on a) the muse and b) how much their understanding of the character clashes with mine. (Angel is the one I'm most awkward about, just because I've built up so much headcanon for her over the years that it can be too jarring for me to interact with a portrayal of her that takes a very different perspective on such details.)

PLOTS OR MEMES: Yes please!

BEST TIME TO WRITE: In the evening, last couple of hours before I go to bed.

ARE YOU LIKE YOUR MUSE: I'd tend to say not; I'm sure I have similarities with some of them (Webby and Connie come to mind as possibly sharing certain traits with me), but on the whole, not so much amongst this cast. Closest to me, I think, would be Da Vinci who, according to the directors, is canonically on the autistic spectrum so I relate to her in regards to that - although some of those similarities I see may be more me projecting on her than being fully canonical!

Tagged: @spirits-of-nature16

Tagging: @talesofourworlds, @starsweepers, @let-me-be-surprised and anyone else who wants to!

[drinking-paintwater]

hi hello, i have 30 something thousand posts on this website and most of them are untagged please be patient with me while i try to organize my blog

*will tag things i don't know what to tag yet as "untagged" so that i can come back to them later. maybe.

**i don't queue things but if i did "this is a queued post" or just "queue" is gonna have to suffice because i do not have enough wits to come up with a funny tag for it.

***brb absorbing this = i am a dragon and i hoard headcanons about my beloved blorbos. this specific tag is about headcanons that i am absorbing into the hoard. not fandom specific.

fandom tags:

mha = my hero academia

minecraft = apparently i have a minecraft tag??? okay??

mdzs = mo dao zu shi

aphverse = i am not making three different tags for minecraft diaries and mystreet and whatever other aphmau content i end up reblogging. anything aphmau gets filed under this tag.

ace attorney = ace attorney

dc = batman. superman. wonder woman. etc. they all go here.

spiderman = spiderman (all of them) go here.

fullmetal = fullmetal alchemist franchise, one tag for both anime adaptations and the manga.

atla = avatar the last airbender. i also throw lok content here.

dm = dungeon meshi

vocaloid = vocaloid. mainly miku.

ladybug = miraculous ladybug tag

not fandom tags:

junk drawer = random posts that don't fall into a specific tag. most often "rb and put in the tags" / polls / etc. i'm not calling things "junk" when i tag them this, i'm putting them in my junk drawer for later, like a flashlight or a pair of old batteries or smth. a lot of my yapping goes into the junk drawer as well, i like to yap in there.

polls i did not vote in = didn't get a chance to vote in the actual poll but i still want to yap in the tags

polls i voted in <3 = exactly what it says on the tin.

[new] nice sounds man = i like the sounds. usuallly funky tunes i like.

important = shit i think is important. incredibly vague tag, i don't think i like this one. might overhaul it at some point.

[new] firefox we love you firefox = i love firefox. this tag contains resources and other things about firefox.

queer = tag for queer/lgbtq+/gay things. community history, the "no, queer is not a slur" reminders, etc.

[new] license to be bad at stuff = references a specific post. going to use it to contain all of those art is survival/resistance/etc reminders as well, i think.

rb bait = exactly what it sounds like. those "rb for xyz" posts go here.

[new] joie de vivre = references a specific post. thinking of using it for things that make me feel all warm and fuzzy. the feel good tag. i might be using this phrase wrong but i don't rlly care tbh.

do i have a fashion tag?? = fashion tag. really inconsistent with it. better luck checking out "pretty" tag, i often combine the two.

[new] cc i like = hi i play the sims 4

navigating tags:

navigating the internet = tips for internet safety and etiquette that i think are helpful.

navigating tumblr = the "navigating the internet" but for tumblr specifically.

navigating ao3 = the "navigating the internet" but for ao3 specifically.

pretty = this is my art tag. i tag pretty art with this.

list of "happy [insert date here]" tags:

happy august 1

happy moon landing day!! :D

happy saturday

[demystifiedstardust]

Tumblr of course is being unusuable bc i think they rolled out another ✨️feature✨️, but i wanted to post this reply to your most recent post!

"I'm (a) Nahida, so if you wanted to ever talk about these things, just gimme a yell! ♡ hopefully the dream didn't shake you up too badly. It was really good that you were able to be lucid enough to move away from situations and not feel unable to *not* participate."

Let me know if you want me to delete this or untag this, but since you said you wanted to post a reply I'm gonna post this publicly!

I appreciate it! I'm doing better; it looks like the dream was thankfully a one-off occurrence, which is good because I was worried it'd be repeating over the next month or so, as it sometimes goes for me when I get wacky selfhood-shifting dreams.

If you're curious, I'll take that invitation to talk about it more right now (but if you meant more like consoling, I am so sorry for totally misreading you afhgjshdg).

(Readmore for infodump)

I was wondering in the back of my mind what it would take to yank me out of Aether-ness. I was only in a Wanderer shift* for a few waking hours before it trickled back in. The shift back over was not unlike juxtaposed dimmer switches for a pair of lightbulbs. I wasn't removed from my usual sense of self-perception long enough to have time to ruminate much, but it was enough time for it to be jarring for my inner voice to shift back to how it usually is.

At the same time, I'm now full of more questions, like how much brain-prodding it would take to repeat the experience of becoming him for a while (although hopefully not in that particular dreamscape again 😬). It's not something I'm necessarily interested in pursing, but I can't help but be curious since my being Aether right now is imo the result of gradually coming to be this way over time in accidental baby-step increments. So theoretically, since I experienced it once, it's probably a sign it would/will happen again under the right conditions?

I'm not used to this sort of quick-and-significant shift in perception at all, but it seems to be relatively common among kinfolk; is this something you have any insight on?

*I didn't even consider a general vocabulary alternative for shifting until now since I'm more of an everything-at-once-mixed-together type, and so I rarely experience what I'd personally consider a shift. Oops. Well, it's a pretty encompassing word, so if the glove fits, then it works for me.

[our-hyperace-experience]

i've had nowhere to talk about this, but this is the closest i can find. my experience is pretty much entirely unique so i don't think anybody can relate to it, but i need it off my chest.

hi, im a hypersexual aromantic-asexual. and an abuser.

i fucked up my last partner bad with my hypersexuality. and they exposed me for it. my mental health took a shit ton of hits during that whole time and just. any romantic or sexual attraction i felt went away completely. i've heard of people getting their romantic/sexual attraction taken away due to trauma, but i'm not sure if i'm a valid aroace person because. mine went away because of the trauma i caused other people. not the trauma put onto me.

i was doing really good. really good for a while. I didn't feel anything. no hypersexuality, no attraction. then i started talking to my victim again. we talked because of this whole big shitstorm event, and they admitted they missed us so much. It's been months and i know i've completely changed as a person, but i still did what i did to them. all that gross sex talk with them. the sexting they didn't want. my hypersexuality ruined them and it tears me up inside every goddamn day. yet they said they needed me.

and i can feel my hypersexuality and attractions coming back to them, and only them, and i'm screaming at myself that this is a "no". that i shouldn't do this. but they need me. it's been months. and they said how lonely they were without me. and every time, every time i think something sexual, it's always about them, and i'm disgusted. it can't be anybody else but them and i don't know what to do.

i want to stay ace. i want to stay aro. i want to make sure i never hurt anyone again. im 16. i shouldn't be feeling like this.

Hi, reading this, I honestly feel for you and your victim, here's what I'll say.

It's clear you are remorseful of your actions and regret for what you had do, acknowledging the harm you caused and taking responsibility is a very important step with self-growth and healing.

This also means that all the urges and desires you feel are most likely against your actual beliefs.

although, I don't know the specifics of what happened between the both of you and your victim. I will say, the victim claiming they miss you and that they feel lonely without you could be an effect from the past abuse.

What I would advise is set firm boundaries between you two, like, ex. avoid sexual topics. If you two's interactions might be triggering the sexual urges, I think writing down some possible boundaries that can reduce those might help.

If it's not enough, I'd also consider cutting ties with the victim, I know it's hard to do that considering the victim's feelings, but staying with someone that had deeply ruined them can also be unhealthy for the both of you.

Especially since you have been doing better during the time without them, and seeing how the urges came back when you started talking to them again could cause problems. If you think the urges are too much, don't be afraid to walk away from the relationship, even if it might sting, it's better to sting now than to damage later.

Another quick thing I wanted to add are healthy outlets. Typically, hypersexual desires and urges can be reduced when you have positive distracts, like exercise, hobbies or doing new activities.

Journaling your thoughts and emotions downs also helps out, it can make you process your emotions and understand the patterns of your behavior, this might help with self-navigation.

Overall, thats my advice, I tried avoiding telling you to get professional help, as many people might not have access to that. You are really brave for speaking out, even if its just to a tumblr blog. I'll keep this post untagged for you out of respect, I hope after this everything gets better, anon 🫂🤎

[angieflynns]

One of the most unhinged thing that I remember happening in regards to this blog was I remember back when Black Panther was first being promoted there was this really dumb trend where people on here were just making shitty comments about the non-black cast members for no reason just because they were "taking away from" the black cast by existing in the movie.

Anyway, I made a post on here that I'm pretty sure I didn't tag with anything about how upset I would be if those people started going after David that I don't remember the exact wording on. Again, this was a completely untagged post on my blog. I guess Tumblr had a rampant problem where just mentioning a word in a post would cause it to come up in searches about the topic (honestly not sure if this is still true).

Some person who had never before interacted with my blog commented on the post telling me to go fuck myself...just because I was discussing how I didn't want my second favorite actor to be targetted by bullies just for being a white guy in Black Panther, and maybe at worst I stated that although he isn't black he was probably hired to be part of the movie because he is literally South African.

[thesealfriend]

Really wish it was feasible for me, an autistic, to block the word "mask" on here (like, partly that it would be possible for me to have posts and discussions about metaphorical masking while avoiding posts about face masks, while dealing with tumblr's "hey here's a post about the thing you said you don't wanna see hidden behind a very tempting button" block feature) because I see no other way of avoiding the frequent but scattered untagged vent posts I see implying that people who don't wear FFP3+ at all times while outside are causing an ableist genocide.

Like not all of them are like that, to be clear. I'd say it's quite the minority, just a vocal one - a good chunk of the posts I see are good-faith venting from people who understand that the sort of people who are deliberately avoiding masking due to ignorance or carelessness, are probably not the folks following their blogs. Most of them are seeking reassurance from other disabled (& generally sensible) people that they're not alone in this. Those have no real grounds to bother me at all, but like I say not all of them are like that, and when you get enough of the really bad ones, even the chill ones start to Really sting.

I'm someone that can't wear a mask long-term (I can last 5 mins to a couple of hours depending on environment) without either puking or having a meltdown, so I risk-assess and wear them when they're gonna be most beneficial (if nobody else on the bus has a mask on, and I feel well, I'm unlikely to be the weak link in the chain for a random stranger. But if I have a sniffle, or I know I've been exposed to something, or know that I'm likely to be in contact with anyone particularly vulnerable, then I'll suck it up, like I did when masking was common enough that I could reasonably be a weak link in the chain) but every time I see one of the more aggressively-worded vents reminding me "you personally are killing disabled people by not doing this one super basic thing", it reaffirms the voice in the back of my head that says meeting my own access needs is frivolous when it could be harming someone else.

Because aye, any singular incident of those consequences is worth someone's life or long-term health, but how the hell am I supposed to weigh up "number of people theoretically protected" vs "liters of stomach contents lost in the process" or "times I've punched myself in the head because of it"? Makes it a hell of a lot harder for me to even try to consider my own health, and a lot easier for me to just put up with it, and keep trying to get "better" at it despite the constant overwhelm.

Like I get it, I get being angry at the people doing it out of blind ignorance and wanting to channel that anger into a vent post. I just wish there was a reasonable way for me to avoid it.

bonus poor-pisser content: "But if you're also disabled & genuinely doing your best in good faith then clearly they're not talking about you! It's not their responsibility to manage your mental health, just leave them to it!" - you're right, it is on me. That's why instead of interacting with anyone posting about it, I'm leaving them the fuck alone but having my own vent about how I'm coming to direct harm because of some folks' language choices, focusing on the fact that I'd like to be able to protect myself from that harm but it's a bit of a bitch to do so, given I'd have to erase a whole-ass noun that has many other useful connotations especially in the communities I'm in.

[ice-and-lightning]

Rules

General rp rules apply, like general decency, no godmodding etc. I'm also mutuals only. I will no longer rp with minors, sorry. This is for my own peace of mind.

I will block personal blogs who likes my starter/inbox calls or rp-wishes.

Veri (he/they), 30+ yo and will not participate in ooc drama or call-out culture. I'm neurodivergent, which does impact on my activity.

If I follow you, I want to rp. I'm shy though, so I might take a moment, but I never follow for follows. If you follow me first, I will usually leave it to you to make first contact, especially if I'm uncertain which one of my muses you're interested in.

If I don't follow back, it's usually because I'm uncertain how our muses could interact, so if you have an idea, please tell me and I might follow you back then. Due to the character being a trigger to me, I will not rp with any Sundays (in case that wasn't obvious from me blocking that character's tag).

I'm not a native English speaker.

No smut will be written. Mun is a borderline sex-averse asexual and have 0 interest in this kind of writing.

Romantic shipping might happen, but only if there's chemistry and a good relationship between muns. Yanqing will not be romantically shipped with any muse over the age of 16 (or that species version of 16).

Common romantic ships I won't rp: Yanqing/Yunli, Arlan/Asta, Moze/Feixiao, Moze/Jiaoqiu, Moze/Feixiao/Jiaoqiu

Don't assume our muses relationship, besides if they know each other or not in canon. I won't even assume that all Jing Yuans will view Yanqing as his son. So please, don't assume how my muses view your muse.

Speaking of relationships though, I love platonic ships and my Yanqing will always view Jing Yuan as a father-figure (although he might never let that be known), just as my Moze view Jiaoqiu and Feixiao in a familial way (and would never tell them that). I never expect other muses to feel the same as mine does.

I use the tag "tw: [subject]" for things I've been told to tag. I have a few triggers on my own that I would like you to tag. Text & img: cannibalism, zombies. Image only: Sunday (the character), smutty stuff, dirty & messy areas.

Things that will usually lead to soft blocking: repeated untagged triggers (as in idgaf about tagging stuff, which is your right, but I also have the right to soft block you then), call-out posts, repeated ooc drama posts (not talking daily life venting, but actually tumblr drama shit), breaking my rules.

Things that will lead to being blocked: I see you posting anything hate-fueled ooc, such as aphobia/acephobia, transphobia, Romaphobia/antiziganism etc. This includes posts about hating ALL men (yes cis men included), if I find out you've sent hate or threat to others.

Affiliation/mains/exclusive. Affiliated with, to me, means that my muses are heavily connected with that person's muse(s). Mentioning of that muse usually indicates their version of them. Mains are pretty much the same as affiliated, but not always. To me, mains are the ones I rp with the most and ones I also talk to ooc. Exclusive, I don't do this for a specific muse, but I might do it for relationships.

Rules might come to change with time. I'll make an announcement if that happens.

[lunarmaden]

heya ✌️ i'm tav / fable, i'm 23 years old, my timezone is est, i've been in the rpc for ~10 years, and you could pour soup in my lap and i'd probably apologize to you. if the way these are worded makes me sound a little harsh, it isn't meant to come off that way!! i've just been in the rpc for too long to be vague or lenient. that said, a few rapid-fire rules before we get into the lengthier ones that actually need explaining:

— don't follow me if you're any sort of phobic towards any group of people. — mun =/= muse, i don't condone everything my muses do, you get the drill. — vagueposting / guiltposting is an instant block from me. it's not cute. we're all adults here, let's communicate and act like it. — don't rush me for replies, period. rushing me for a thread at all will result in me flat out dropping it.

[ 1 ] for blogs that i can’t see myself interacting with, i will soft block you to keep my followers clean. personal blogs will be hard blocked immediately unless a sideblog is attached to it and i can easily see that your personal blog is a hub. note that it will take me a little while sometimes to decide if i want to follow back. give me a few days at a minimum. do not unfollow and follow again and again to get my attention. i will just hard block you and call it a day.

[ 2 ] i'm neutral on callouts. if i see them and think the proof provided in it is actually valid, then i'll reblog it under my psa tag and leave it at that, no further discussion. it will not go under "drama tw" or anything of the sort, because if it's serious enough, it isn't petty drama. it's a genuine warning passed to other members of the community so they can make their own opinions about. that said, i also believe people can change. if there is proof of that, then i see no reason to hold past mistakes over someone's head.

[ 3 ] i will only write with 18+ muns. if you follow me and are a minor or your age is not listed clearly on your blog, i will soft block you immediately. do not lie to me about your age, you will be hard blocked if i find out.

on a similar but less serious note, i also don't follow if i can't immediately see an alias. just...kinda wanna know who i'm following, is all.

[ 4 ] i get that plotting is kinda important for some people!! however, rarely will i ever fully plot a thread, and i heavily prefer using memes to interact. now, plotting for the general vibe of the thread and dynamic between characters? absolutely!! but frankly, if i relied on completely plotting threads, i'd kill my creativity and get even less done than i already do. i'm here for a fun time, not a stressful and / or long time, so please be aware.

[ 5 ] speaking of relying on memes, send me several at a time! you're probably more likely to get a response if you give me variety to work with. if i get a meme i don't think i can work with, i'll probably send several back to you to make up for it. just so things don't feel lopsided or something.

[ 6 ] i am 23 and valynn is an adult ( even though elven ages are... a little weird ), so nsfw content is likely to show up here in some capacity. when it does, it'll be tagged as "nsfw //" ( or "suggestive //" if it's only implied ). however, i'm likely only going to write those topics with people i'm close to.

[ 7 ] anon hate is cringe, so if you send it, it won't get a response from me unless it's to make fun of you. at this point i expect most of us to know not to answer it seriously otherwise the sender is just being encouraged, so if i keep seeing it being answered / talked about on the dash ( unless it's being poked fun at ), i'm probably just going to soft block for my sake because. y'know, you didn't wanna get the negativity, i don't wanna see that negativity, etcetera.

on that note, untagged negativity will also lead to me unfollowing. untagged posts in general will lead to me unfollowing if it's a frequent thing, honestly.

[ 8 ] with how difficult tumblr has made it as of late to properly source things, i have become significantly more lenient when it comes to people reblogging memes and musings from me, as long as it isn't like several posts in a row. that said, i expect this understanding to be mutual. i'll always try to reblog from the source if i can, but if not, it'll just have to come from whoever slapped it on the dash.

[ 9 ] if you need something tagged, tell me! i’ll do my best to remember to tag what i need to, but please remind me if i happen to forget. the system i use is just "trigger //". now, if you use fancy tags for nsfw posts or posts that otherwise need a trigger warning and refuse to adjust if confronted about it, that's getting a hard block. it isn't difficult to be respectful of what people need tagged. the refusal to do so for your aesthetic is kinda fucked.

as for what i need tagged, all i ask is that visuals of sunflowers are tagged appropriately. i would also appreciate detailed mentions of terminal illness being tagged, specifically cancer, but that's more of a squick than a trigger, so that one is less of a problem.

[ 10 ] obligatory "let's just have fun" rule here. we're all on this hellsite to write our silly little guys, it really isn't that serious. just be decent, and we'll be chill!!

[lexosaurus]

No lol I'll always appreciate a good metaphor. And I do appreciate the civil discourse too.

I do think it's the quickest and easiest current solution, even if it's not the solution I like. Clearly the sitting back and politely waiting while reblogging a tag guide every few months has not been successful. I get that very much.

Also, I just want to say that I really don't like the perception that we're trying to police like this is an isolated thing, when really we're just following what other fandoms everywhere on Tumblr do. Like when I started DP x The Martian content, it was a drop in the bucket for the DP tag, but it absolutely flooded The Martian tag. People in that fandom asked me to not tag the main The Martian tag with the crossover content, and I was like yup sure no problem 👍 I untagged my stuff, and we all went on our merry ways.

So this is just a common courtesy thing that fandoms everywhere on this webbed site do.

But like obviously, in this case, that concepts not taking. I really really don't want to start blocking people because as I said, that would suck majorly for community events. If this is what people vote is the best solution, sure I'll adopt it. And I have seen the genuine consideration that Jack has taken with the pros and cons. Even if it's annoying for me personally, which like I get I'm just one person lol, I get where people are coming from where the pros outweigh the cons.

This would be used in addition to the danny phantom tag, turning it into a true umbrella tag for everything related to Danny Phantom, while having a few major sub-tags for people to find exactly what they want.

---

After some more discussion with members of the fandom in the notes of my poll asking about a community and elsewhere, it seems like the better option for everyone might actually be a new tag, so I'm making a new poll here!

Some answers to questions I think people might have are below the readmore:

Q: Why are all of these only one word?

A: For the same reason the dpxdc tag is only one word! Tumblr's tagging implementation is Not Good. Tags with spaces don't play well with it, and especially don't play well with blocked tags. If someone wants to block non-crossover Danny Phantom content, we want to make it as painless as possible for them.

Q: What issues were raised around communities?

A: A few! To name some of them:

Limited interactions with posts: Communities only let you react with emoji and leave comments on posts reblogged into them. Not great, if we want to have long reblog chains riffing on one another

Original Posters aren't notified if someone else reblogs their post into a community, even if it's public. So if someone reblogged your post into the community for you, you wouldn't know about it -- or know to look for people interacting with it.

Communities have mods, and therefore would need trustworthy, engaged mods to make it work. Over a short time frame, we could probably manage it! But over a longer one, a community for an entire fandom would probably have moderator drama. That could lead to fracturing, or people leaving specifically because they don't like the mods, etc. A tag is a lot less active maintenance.

A few people also expressed a general dislike for the feature, even if they were willing to move to one. This seems like a much smaller change that will let those people stay away from a feature they don't like, while interacting with the content they do.

Q: What about less-common crossovers? Won't those get excluded from this tag?

A: They will. I'm asking about this poll first because I figured getting the community to make a decision about the other crossovers would be easier if we'd already decided on the non-crossovers.

The current idea is to move those to their own tag as well, so they can get dedicated attention from the crossover enthusiasts who love them. One of the people I talked to about this runs the niche-dp-crossovers blog, so it's on the radar. If you have concerns or suggestions about that, the notes on this post is as good a place as any to suggest them!

[manijardi]

I went to tw for like two seconds and 1) ew the new logo sucks and 2) I'm immediately triggered by untagged ship fanart posts.

I come back to tumblr and first thing I see is "this post contains filtered tags" and AAA that's good✨

Another good reason why I'll probably won't be coming back to tw anytime soon. Except to post when I go live on twitch because I have more reach there than here at the end of the day, but anyways.

Getting triggered by ships was not in my 2023 bingo card but here we are I guess!!!!

[lookitsstevie]

Okay, this is the last post about this situation since this is getting pointless... I'll just debunk every claim they have and then. Ignore them. Since they won't change. they're telling ME to change 😂

This is a screenshot of their newest post, provided to me from another user (clarifying this since they seem to believe I'm some kind of evil mastermind and sending people to look at them....? People don't listen to me, they have their free will! And most of them also had some stories to tell about this user)

Okay let's start from the beginning:

posted untagged porn on twitter : never happened, already explained. Nobody on twitter saw that either

blocked multiple people on twitter : is blocking.... problematic?

'I just know that a blocklist was involved' : so no evidence 😭 I just blocked everyone in that thread, that thread is a blocklist if there is one

'They have posted about me both on Twitter and on Tumblr' : The twitter thing was because of. This (and this confirms that this person is the same user who tweeted this) (also this screenshot was provided from a friend, since they had me blocked already)

Hid their handle (red) and the other artist's name (teal). Well yeah, I had to clarify that it was nothing personal at that point, since this user was claiming I'm... victim blaming them... by.... blocking

On tumblr? Of course I had to say something since... they're..... telling people not to support me while providing zero evidence why

6. 'making up rumors saying that I'm attacking multiple artists' : again.... where. Also in the screenshot above you were actually attacking multiple artists yes

7. 'sending people to look through my account' : as I mentioned above... PEOPLE HAVE THEIR FREE WILL AND THEIR OWN STORIES. Actually I explicitly stated that people should not go interact with them in the last post....

8. 'just try to speak to me' : HOW?? They have me blocked and I won't make a burner account just to speak to them, and as the one who got accused of being problematic I should let people know that is completely false lmao It's not between them and me anymore. Also look at the screenshot above they were already malicious in November 2022

9. 'coming from a grown adult' : This is a weird thing to say because this person... is also a grown adult iirc. Really why are they trying to frame themselves young and vulnerable, they don't even know if I'm actually younger than them or not

Okay! That's all. As I said this is the last post, I'll pin this for a while since this person would keep making up things about me : ) Thank you so much for reading this!

+ Edited to specify that I have NEVER talked to or otherwise interacted with this person before that weird calling out happened - it's possible I answered them when they commented on my art, but the twitter account is long gone and I can't find anything by search. The only interaction was Me blocking them, Twice (bc of course they made another account to follow me when I blocked their first).

Oh wait, they have sent me a LONG twitter dm when the first blocking happened, but when I checked the message I couldn't answer it; Probably they have already blocked me on that account before I answer, or that account already deactivated. I took a screenshot of it then, bc I had no idea why I can't send them messages back so I wanted to consult my friends : )